FSSAI Plans One-Phase Rollout of Front-of-Pack Labelling Rules
FSSAI has suggested one-time introduction of FoPL norms for packaged foods that include more added sugar, fat or salt than is allowed. The suggested framework includes red hexagonal warning labels for nutrients of concern and a front-of-pack warning for non-caloric sweeteners.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has suggested a one-stage implementation of the framework for front-of-the-pack warning labels (FoPL). Companies producing food will be obligated to post warning labels on the front of their packaging once the proposed framework is put into effect. They must take this action if their products include more than the allowed levels of added sugar, fat, or salt, which are the nutrients that cause concern. Following its notification, it plans to offer packaged food producers a year to voluntarily shift to the front-of-the-pack labelling structure.
FSSAI’s Label Proposal Submitted to Supreme Court
In its documents submitted to the Supreme Court, FSSAI has indicated that it is recommending a red hexagon with a white square background for the Foreign Official Language (FoPL) format, which is somewhat similar to the one Canada has used. Also, if there's just one problematic nutrient, the hexagon will show which one it is. It is required to identify the two or three nutrients that are relevant within a single hexagon when there are two or three nutrients that are of relevance.
Therefore, giving customers precise and understandable information. Additionally, the FSSAI must publish the proposed regulations in order to engage stakeholders in the consultation process. The food safety agency has proposed a one-year grace period for FBOs to voluntarily make the changes. To make sure food companies don't have a hard time making money, the deadline for the transition period is one year from when the new labelling requirements are announced. Because food producers often print their packaging materials in advance and in bulk, any modifications to the labels are implemented after a transition period for the packaged food industry.
FSSAI Bringing More Transparency in Food Business
In its submission to the Supreme Court, the regulator has also suggested that food and drink items containing non-caloric sweeteners should bear a warning label reading "Contains Non-Caloric Sweetener" on the front of the packaging. The food safety regulator had previously suggested a two-stage plan to introduce the warning labels on the front of the package. Last month, Reuters reported that the food safety debate in India has heated up after the government chose a less stringent labelling system in response to lobbying from companies like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestle, who claimed that warning labels were useless.
On the other hand, many businesses in the European market have willingly adopted such policies. The new regulations might lead to the red labelling of numerous traditional sweets, chips, and cola, according to industry leaders. A group that speaks for both international and domestic companies, the All India Food Processors' Association has warned the Supreme Court that the potential labelling of numerous popular items with health warnings will damage the reputation of Indian cuisine around the world.
